Course Comments
Home ] Start Here ] Syllabus ] Content/Assignments ] Links ] Discussion ] [ Course Comments ]

 

Up

 

When you have completed this course, please take the time to fill out this form so that we can continue to improve our online courses.

Some things to think about:

Are you leaving this course with functional knowledge?

Can you make practical applications of the course material?

Did you get your money's worth?

 

Assessment of Course

1. What is helping the learning process?

 

2. What is hindering the learning process?

 

3. What can be done to improve/enhance the learning process?

Delivery of Content  

 

Instruction

Communication

Excellent

Structure and delivery of course material enhanced learning experience; essential content conveyed using thoughtful comments and relevant examples; instructor evidenced a thorough understanding of course content and a deep concern for student learning; fully incorporated MI strategies in instruction.

Good

Course content was communicated effectively; comments and examples enhanced student learning; instructor displayed a deep understanding of course content; made appropriate course management decisions that accommodated student needs; incorporated MI strategies in instruction.

Acceptable

Course content communicated efficiently; instructor displayed a familiarity with course content and an ability to work with students to facilitate their learning; MI strategies were discussed and some were incorporated in learning experiences.

Inadequate

Poor communication; lack of interest or knowledge of course content; no connection with MI instruction.

Feedback and Assessment

Excellent

Instructor provides prompt feedback with supporting remarks; assessment tasks provide powerful learning experiences and showcase student learning; time spent completing assignments was well-invested.

Good

Instructor provides feedback in a timely manner with comments; communicates expectations clearly, assigns well-chosen activities that contributing to student learning; makes good use of student time.

Acceptable

Instructor provides feedback and the opportunity for students with the opportunity to determine instructor(s)’ expectations; most assessment tasks enhance student learning; assessments are scored fairly and consistently.

Inadequate

Feedback is slow or nonexistent; assignment tasks require too large a commitment of time, do not contribute to learning, or are irrelevant to course content.

Support

Good

Instructor replies promptly to questions; provides clear answers and insightful comments.

Adequate

Instructor provides help within a reasonable time; answers questions; makes suggestions to remedy difficulties.

Inadequate

Not responsive to student concerns; lack of assistance interferes with learning, questions not answered in a timely manner or not answered adequately.

 

Internet

Design

Good

Web pages load quickly; organization of website contributes to easy navigation; well written directions, inviting design, and legible text.

Acceptable

Web pages generally load quickly; natural organization for website; text is legible, provides necessary instructions, and links.

Inadequate

Web pages load slowly; distracting graphics; website difficult to navigate website; text is difficult read because of size, format, or lack of contrast.

Technical Support

Good

Prompt friendly assistance; clear answers to questions; technical problems solved quickly

Acceptable

Help provided within a reasonable time; technical questions answered; important problems corrected

Inadequate

Lack of help interferes with learning, questions not answered in a timely manner, or technical problems left uncorrected.

 

Textbook

 

Depth

Good

Rich source of ideas; clarifies concepts; will remain useful as a reference

Acceptable

Supports instruction; provides necessary content; interesting.

Inadequate

Not enough content; difficult to distinguish important ideas; does not support instruction.

Readability

Acceptable

Clear presentation; good organization; appropriate length

Unacceptable

Vague, disorganized, or difficult to read

Course Content 

 

  Content

Topics

 

Excellent

Develops a deep understanding of students’ learning and teachers’ roles; perfect fit with program’s philosophy and goals; life changing ideas; exceeded expectations for course.

Good

Provides crucial information leading to new understandings of concepts related to teaching and learning; knowledge gained more than met expectations for course.

Adequate

Presents new and generally useful ideas, encourages thinking about classroom management decisions; content fits with program philosophy and objectives.

Marginal

Some relevant information; minimal connections made to other courses in program or MI strategies.

Unacceptable

Inaccurate or irrelevant content

 Quantity

 

Good

Time spent on course well matched with credit earned; frequent opportunities to reflect on concepts and ideas; time spent on course was substantial and well-spent.

Adequate

Appropriate amount of content for course credit.

Unacceptable

Presented either too much content in too little time, or too little content to justify time invested

Course Value

 Did this course meet or exceed your expectations? If not, why not? If so, how?

    Which are the most valuable components of this course?

 

  What parts of the course did not contribute to your learning?

 

  What else did you hope to learn?

 

  What other information do you feel we should know?