There are many kinds of educational philosophies, but for the sake of simplicity it is possible to extract five distinct ones. These five philosophies are (1) perennialism, (2) idealism, (3) realism, (4) experimentalism, and (5) existentialism. Collectively, these philosophies represent a broad spectrum of thought about what schools should be and do. Educators holding these philosophies would create very different schools for students to attend and learn. In the following sections, each of these standard philosophies is discussed in terms of its posture on axiological, epistemological, and ontological questions.
The five standard philosophies are compared in Table 2.1 in terms of attitudes on significant questions.
The most conservative, traditional, or inflexible of the five philosophies is perennialism, a philosophy drawing heavily from classical definitions of education. Perennialists believe that education, like human nature, is a constant. Because the distinguishing characteristic of humans is the ability to reason, education should focus on developing rationality. Education, for the perennialist, is a preparation for life, and students should be taught the world's permanencies through structured study.
For the perennialist, reality is a world of reason. Such truths are revealed to us through study and sometimes through divine acts. Goodness is to be found in rationality itself. Perennialists would favor a curriculum of subjects and doctrine, taught through highly disciplined drill and behavior control. Schools for the perennialist exist primarily to reveal reason by teaching eternal truths. The teacher interprets and tells. The student is a passive recipient. Because truth is eternal, all change in the immediate school environment is largely superficial.
is a philosophy that espouses the refined wisdom of men and women.
Reality is seen as a world within a person's mind. Truth is to be found
in the consistency of ideas. Goodness is an ideal state, something to be
strived for. Idealism would favor schools teaching subjects of the mind,
such as is found in most public school classrooms. Teachers, for the
idealist, would be models of ideal behavior.
For idealists, the schools' function is to sharpen intellectual
processes, to present the wisdom of the ages, and to present models of
behavior that are exemplary. Students in such schools would have a
somewhat passive role, receiving and memorizing the reporting of the
teacher. Change in the school program would generally be considered an
intrusion on the orderly process of educating.
For the realist, the world is as it is, and the job of schools would be to teach students about the world. Goodness, for the realist, would be found in the laws of nature and the order of the physical world. Truth would be the simple correspondences of observation. The realist would favor a school dominated by subjects of the here-and-now world, such as math and science. Students would be taught factual information for mastery. The teacher would impart knowledge of this reality to students or display such reality for observation and study. Classrooms would be highly ordered and disciplined, like nature, and the students would be passive participants in the study of things. Changes in school would be perceived as a natural evolution toward a perfection of order.
the experimentalist, the world is an ever-changing place. Reality is
what is actually experienced. Truth is what presently functions.
Goodness is what is accepted by public test. Unlike the perennialist,
idealist, and realist, The
experimentalist openly accepts change and continually seeks to discover
new ways to expand and improve society.
The experimentalist would favor a school with heavy emphasis on
social subjects and experiences. Learning would occur through a
problem-solving or inquiry format. Teachers would aid learners or
consult with learners who would be actively involved in discovering and
experiencing the world in which they live. Such an education program's
focus on value development would factor in group consequences.
The existentialist sees the world as one personal subjectivity, where goodness, truth, and reality are individually defined. Reality is a world of existing, truth subjectively chosen, and goodness a matter of freedom.